Search Postgresql Archives

Splitting tables or databases? That's the problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On a 128MB RAM, 450 MHz pentium 3  server with linux gentoo and postgresql
7.4.6 on an office lan we can manage satisfactorily a db containing few
tables with a cumbersome amount of data (each table is around 650 thousand
records with 98 columns) relating to the year 2002.
We use M$-Access and ODBC to access those data.
Now similar data and amounts of records for the year 2003 need to be added.
Then queries to contrast  2003 data vs. 2002 ones will be needed.

In view of the poor hardware at our disposal, is it better from the standpoint
of efficiency  to:

1) Create a new database for 2003 with the same structure of that for 2002;
2) Appending new 2003 data to 2002 data in the same tables;
3) Creating in the original database new, separate tables to contain data
for 2003.

Thanks
Vittorio


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux