Search Postgresql Archives

Re: PGS 7.2 : Insert with wrong number of values did not

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Scott Marlowe wrote:

On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 09:49, Geoffrey KRETZ wrote:


Scott Marlowe wrote:



On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 09:38, Geoffrey KRETZ wrote:




Hi,

I've got a question about a difference beetween PGS 7.2 and PGS 7.4 behaviours.

With PGS 7.2 :
INSERT INTO table (col1, col2) VALUES (val1) doesn't fail

With PGS 7.4 :
INSERT INTO table (col1, col2) VALUES (val1) failed

Is it a known bug ?




Yes, if 7.2 did that it WAS a known bug.  Fixed in 7.4.  It is illegal
to have unmatching numbers of columns in the insert list and the column
list.

Did 7.2 really do that?





7.1 do that and while testing recently, we found that in 7.2, it's the same behaviour. In 7.3, it's already ok.

I've answer the question just to be sure that it's a postgresql bug.




Note that in the old version, postgresql would have inserted a default
value or a NULL if there was no default.  With the addition of the
DEFAULT keyword, you can get the same basic effect with:

insert into table (col1, col2) values (val1,DEFAULT);



I've read a thread about that, but I wasn't sure about the PostgreSQL's version where the change was made.


Thx for your answers !

Geoffrey KRETZ
Four J's Development Tools


---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux