Search Postgresql Archives

Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Freitag, 11. Februar 2005 13:37 schrieb Marques Johansson:

A recent Slashdot thread on MySQL performance
(http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/11/038232&from=rss)
contains a comment mentioning the following Fermilab report from May 2003:


They were apparently testing with PostgreSQL 6.3 at best, so I'd disregard this report.


Perhaps someone from advocacy could go through their list of issues and help them. They do seem to be trying to update it, and now have references to newer features: "Datafile location and a tablespace implementation as of version 8."


However some of their criteria (savepoints:"no", incremental online backups:"no", and "access to multiple databases: no" (what about dblink)) still seem incorrect.


Fermilab did have contact information ("mail comments to:") at the bottom of the page. Fermilab's a quite highly respected organization, so I think this page is probably trusted by many.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux