On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 09:50:41PM -0500, Jan wrote: > I've been using PostgreSQL for about three months. So far my > only objection is that "pg_affected" provides the number of attempts > rather than the number of rows that are actually changed. I could > easily do that with a little counter. Please provide some context: What "pg_affected" are you talking about? How are you determining that it provides "attempts" instead of "actual"? > I think PostgreSQL should be changed to return the number of rows > actually changed (whether updated, inserted or deleted). Please provide an example of what you're doing, what results you expect or would like to see, and what results you actually get. -- Michael Fuhr http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
