On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 3:14 PM Raphael Salguero Aragón <raphael.salguero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 23.09.2024 um 17:37 schrieb Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@xxxxxxxxx>: > > I'd be glad to use Pavel's proposed %N. —DD > I just wanted to add that we are also supporting a larger customer with exactly the same request. > Perhaps this increases the value of the adjustment a little more :) Hi. Thanks for sharing Raphael. That's a 3rd notch Tom! :) So is it the proverbial "third time's a charm" and the community would revise its initial rejection? I keep making that point, but the fact this is entirely opt-in, mitigates the "expensive" argument IMHO. FWIW. Thank you for considering this RFC again, especially since there's a patch for it. Respectfully, --DD
