On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 2:55 PM Christophe Pettus <xof@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2024, at 09:15, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Doesn't the existence of a replication slot force PG to retain WAL files when replication is broken?
It does. I don't recall if the OP said that they were using a persistent replication slot or not; it's not as common with binary replication as with logical replication.
Really? I wonder why people fight with configuring max_wal_size and wal_keep_size, when replication slots do all the work for you.
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!
