Right, I was thinking that I would be able to get away with updating the repo file and fixing the issue that way.
I've just checked the packages with dnf whatprovides postrgres and indeed everything is coming down from Red Hat repos:
postgresql-15.8-1.module+el9.4.0+25512+c6b50a48.x86_64 : PostgreSQL client programs
Repo : @System
Repo : @System
postgresql-15.8-1.module+el9.4.0+25512+c6b50a48.x86_64 : PostgreSQL client programs
Repo : appstream
Repo : appstream
If I were to move in getting the packages just from pgdg we need just the
[pgdg-common] block?
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 5:01 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/8/24 08:56, Paul Brindusa wrote:
> I just ran from the host dnf update -y pgdg-redhat-repo.
> And retried dnf update -y libpq5 which comes back again with:
That is not what Devrin suggested, go back and read:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/0a805069f207406b6c68a023bda5a9bbcda1db16.camel%40gunduz.org
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
