Search Postgresql Archives

Re: PG17 optimizations to vacuum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/09/2024 00:01, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 4:58 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@xxxxxx> wrote:
Do you have any non-default settings? "select name,
current_setting(name), source  from pg_settings where setting <>
boot_val;" would show that.

What about page checksums?

One simple explanation is that we're writing extra FPIs to set hint
bits. But that explanation only works if you assume that page-level
checksums are in use (or that wal_log_hints is turned on).

Hmm, yeah, that might be it. With chceksums enabled, I see ~120k WAL records, vs ~90k without checksums. But there's no difference between v16 and master.

Pavel, did you test v17 with checksums enabled and v16 with checksums disabled, by any chance?

--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux