Search Postgresql Archives

Re: dead tuple difference between pgstattuple and pg_stat_user_tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/23/24 09:14, Matthew Tice wrote:
Hi All,

I'm trying to understand why there's a difference between what pgstattuple reports and pg_stat_user_tables reports (for the number of dead tuples).

As I understand, pgstattuple and pgstattuple_approx return the exact number of dead tuples (as noted in the documentation) and based on an

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/pgstattuple.html

pgstattuple_approx(regclass) returns record

pgstattuple_approx is a faster alternative to pgstattuple that returns approximate results.

Not sure how you get exact count out of that?


This is a Google Alloy DB instance running:

https://cloud.google.com/alloydb/docs/overview

"AlloyDB for PostgreSQL is a fully managed, PostgreSQL-compatible database service that's designed for your most demanding workloads, including hybrid transactional and analytical processing. AlloyDB pairs a Google-built database engine with a cloud-based, multi-node architecture to deliver enterprise-grade performance, reliability, and availability."

Where the important parts are 'PostgreSQL-compatible' and 'Google-built database engine'. You probably need to reach out to Google to see what that means for this situation.


 > select version();
-[ RECORD 1 ]-------------------------
version | PostgreSQL 14.10 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by Debian clang version 12.0.1, 64-bit
SELECT 1

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux