On 8/10/24 13:23, yudhi s wrote:
On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 8:22 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Why not use INSERT ... ON CONFLICT instead of MERGE?
>
> MERGE INTO tab1 AS target
> USING (VALUES ('5efd4c91-ef93-4477-840c-a723ae212d99', 123,
>
'2024-08-09T11:33:49.402585600Z','2024-08-09T11:33:49.402585600Z')) AS
> source(id, mid,txn_timestamp, cre_ts)
> ON target.id <http://target.id> <http://target.id
<http://target.id>> = source.id <http://source.id> <http://source.id
<http://source.id>>
> WHEN MATCHED THEN
> UPDATE SET mid = source.mid
> WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
> INSERT (id, mid, txn_timestamp, cre_ts)
> VALUES (source.id <http://source.id> <http://source.id
<http://source.id>>,source.mid,
> source.txn_timestamp, source.cre_ts);
Actually , as per the business logic , we need to merge on a column
which is not unique or having any unique index on it. It's the leading
column of a composite unique key though. And in such scenarios the
"INSERT.... ON CONFLICT" will give an error. So we are opting for a
merge statement here, which will work fine with the column being
having duplicate values in it.
Alright it's official I am confused.
You started with:
WITH source_data (id, mid, txn_timestamp, cre_ts) AS (
VALUES ('5efd4c91-ef93-4477-840c-a723ae212d66', 123,
'2024-08-09T11:33:49.402585600Z', '2024-08-09T11:33:49.402585600Z')
)
INSERT INTO tab1 (id, mid, txn_timestamp, cre_ts)
SELECT id, mid, txn_timestamp, cre_ts
FROM source_data
ON CONFLICT (id) DO UPDATE
SET mid = EXCLUDED.mid,
txn_timestamp = EXCLUDED.txn_timestamp,
cre_ts = EXCLUDED.cre_ts;
That implied that id was unique in of itself. As side note you called it
a merge, which it is not as in MERGE. At this point I got off track
thinking of MERGE.
Then you went to the below which is a merge:
MERGE INTO tab1 AS target
USING (VALUES ('5efd4c91-ef93-4477-840c-a723ae212d99', 123,
'2024-08-09T11:33:49.402585600Z','2024-08-09T11:33:49.402585600Z')) AS
source(id, mid,txn_timestamp, cre_ts)
ON target.id = source.id
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE SET mid = source.mid
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
INSERT (id, mid, txn_timestamp, cre_ts)
VALUES (source.id,source.mid, source.txn_timestamp, source.cre_ts);
The question I have now is if id is part of a composite UNIQUE index on
this:
CREATE TABLE tab1 (
id varchar(100) ,
mid INT,
txn_timestamp TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL,
cre_ts TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL
) PARTITION BY RANGE (txn_timestamp);
Then what is the other column in the UNIQUE index?
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
