Search Postgresql Archives

Re: data checksums

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Aug 6, 2024, at 19:45, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am surprised by that.  Would you say that most storage systems will happily give you a
> garbage block if there was a hardware problem somewhere?

"Most" is hard for me to judge.  HDDs can have uncorrected and undetected errors, definitely.  ZFS, for example, can correct those (within limits); XFS doesn't try.  I have been told that SSDs can have uncorrected/undetected errors as well, but I don't know details on that.

> Turning data checksums on will write WAL for hint bits, which can significantly increase
> the amount of WAL written.

I was curious about that, so I just did a quick experiment using pgbench, with identical databases except for checksums.  They both generated the same amount of WAL within 10% or so, so I don't think the impact is huge.  (And you need the hint bits for pg_rewind, which is a nice thing to have in your back pocket if required.)





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux