Search Postgresql Archives

Re: libpq version macro to use or not PQsocketPoll

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Hi. Now that v17beta2 is part of my dev-env, I'm trying out the new API.
> And I discover there's no version macro for conditional compilation in LIBPQ...

Indeed, that's an oversight, and there's a number of other things
we added to libpq-fe.h between 16 and 17 that probably deserve
their own LIBPQ_HAS symbols.

> I'm not sure what's so wrong with version macro as such.

A couple of things:
* It doesn't help if we forget to update it, so it's not really
  better than HAS_ symbols on that score.
* Usage is error-prone (you might test for the wrong cutoff version)
  and not very readable.
* We can't retroactively make such a symbol appear in old copies
  of libpq-fe.h.

			regards, tom lane






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux