Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Fwd: Regarding tables detach concurrently with run_maintenance_proc()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi ,

You can consider the pg_pathman extension.



Muhammad Imtiaz

PostgreSQL Technical Support Lead / Pakistan R&D

Mobile: +923345072521
Email: imtiaz.m@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 7:55 PM Durgamahesh Manne <maheshpostgres9@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 7:55 PM Christoph Berg <myon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Re: Durgamahesh Manne
> with pg_partman By default proc() does not detach tables concurrently. How
> do we implement tables detach concurrently without blocking other sessions
> Here queries not using date column to detach tables with
> run_maintenance_proc() which is not using concurrently  based on the
> retention policy which leads to scan all available child tables hence need
> to trigger this proc with concurrently option to avoid blocking other child
> tables beyond rentention policy while running statements on them

You might have more success by filing pg_partman issues at
https://github.com/pgpartman/pg_partman/issues

> Do we have any other alternative rather than using pg_partman()?

Well you can just run the same commands manually that pg_partman would
run.

Christoph

Hi 
You might have more success by filing pg_partman issues at
https://github.com/pgpartman/pg_partman/issues     >>> okay
 My intention is to have any other extension other than pg_partman to manage table partitions manually

Regards
Durga Mahesh

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux