On Fri, 5 Jul 2024 at 17:07, Lok P <loknath.73@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Also I understand the technical limitation of the max number of columns per table is ~1600. But should you advise to restrict/stop us to some low number long before reaching that limit , such that we will not face any anomalies when we grow in future. And if we should maintain any specific order in the columns from start to end column in the specific table?
Something else you may wish to consider, depending on the column types
of your 900+ columns is the possibility that some INSERTs may fail due
to row length while others with shorter variable length values may be
ok.
Here's a quick example with psql:
select 'create table a (' || string_agg('a'||x||' text not null
default $$$$',',') || ')' from generate_series(1,1000)x;
\gexec
insert into a default values;
INSERT 0 1
again but with a larger DEFAULT to make the tuple larger.
select 'create table b (' || string_agg('a'||x||' text not null
default $$hello world$$',',') || ')' from generate_series(1,1000)x;
\gexec
insert into b default values;
ERROR: row is too big: size 12024, maximum size 8160
There is a paragraph at the bottom of [1] with some warnings about
things relating to this.
The tuple length would be fixed for fixed-length types defined as NOT
NULL. So, if you have that, there should be no such surprises.
David
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/limits.html
