Search Postgresql Archives

Re: libpq v17 PQsocketPoll timeout is not granular enough

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/10/24 11:43, Dominique Devienne wrote:
Bummer… I didn’t presume to suggest an api before, but simply adding an extra int with the milliseconds offset from the time_t is simple, and trivial to plug into the implementation I saw. Callers who don’t care can simply pass zero. while I could pass a computed time_t and ms offset using <chrono>. No need for fancy types imho. Aren’t betas precisely for

https://www.postgresql.org/developer/beta/

"PostgreSQL beta and release candidate releases are pre-release testing versions before the community makes a new release generally available. They are feature-frozen (i.e. no new features are added), and we release these to the public for testing before our final release. PostgreSQL beta and release candidate release are not meant for use in production systems."


the purpose of exposing apis to those like myself to vet them? This is also beta1, I,e, the first one. My €0.02


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux