On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 13:10, <albrecht.dress@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > According to the documentation, Table 9.31, IMHO both comparisons should > produce the same results, as > timestamp - timestamp → interval > timestamp + interval → timestamp Your problem may be due to interval comparison. Intervals are composed of months, days and seconds, as not every month has 30 days and not every day has 86400 seconds, so to compare them you have to normalize them somehow, which can lead to bizarre results. => select '2 years'::interval > '1 year 362 days'::interval; ?column? ---------- f (1 row) => select '2 years'::interval > '1 year 359 days'::interval; ?column? ---------- t (1 row) => select '2 years'::interval > '1 year 360 days'::interval; ?column? ---------- f (1 row) => select '2 years'::interval = '1 year 360 days'::interval; ?column? ---------- t (1 row) If you want to do point in time arithmetic, you will be better of by extracting epoch from your timestamps and substracting that. Intervals are more for calendar arithmetic on the type "set me a date two months, three days and four hours from the last". Francisco Olarte.
