Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Does indexing help >= as well as = for integer columns?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I had thought that the Creation of the Index would do something
equivalent to Analyze.  I tried Analyze Verbose and it improved
the scanner's ability to predict when an index would be useful.

Last week, I asked about visualizing B-tree "coverage".  I think
I meant "Can I see the histograms that Analyze creates?"
Are they available anywhere?  The docs mention them (bins) and I
was hoping Analyze Verbose would show them to me.

TJ

Tom Lane wrote:
"TJ O'Donnell" <tjo@xxxxxxx> writes:

This I don't get.  Why is an index scan not used?  Isn't an index supposed
to help when using > < >= <= too?
Explain Analyze Select count(smiles) from structure where _c >= 30
Aggregate  (cost=196033.74..196033.74 rows=1 width=32) (actual time=42133.432..42133.434 rows=1
loops=1)
 ->  Seq Scan on structure  (cost=0.00..191619.56 rows=1765669 width=32) (actual
time=8050.437..42117.062 rows=1569 loops=1)
       Filter: (_c >= 30)


Have you ANALYZEd the table lately?  That rowcount estimate is off by
about three orders of magnitude :-(

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux