czw., 8 lut 2024 o 21:35 Alpaslan AKDAĞ <alpaslanakdag@xxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
AlpaslanBest Regards,Is this information from the Documentation?If it is like that, there is not any problem. I tried to find an explanation that hot standby archive wal files or not but I couldn't.Hello MateuszThank you for your answer.On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:24 PM Mateusz Henicz <mateuszhenicz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:czw., 8 lut 2024 o 21:10 Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@xxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 09:23 +0100, Alpaslan AKDAĞ wrote:
> Thank you for your answer.
>
> I have checked the pg_is_in_recovery() and here are the results
> from primary and hot stand by server.
>
> Primary (old standby ):
> select pg_is_in_recovery();
> pg_is_in_recovery
> -------------------
> f
> (1 row)
>
> hot standby(old primary):
> select pg_is_in_recovery();
> pg_is_in_recovery
> -------------------
> t
> (1 row)
> and there is also standby.signal file in standby server.
> So it seems that there is nothing wrong.
>
> recovery_min_apply_delay = '2d' are set in warm standby servers.
> Before the switchover we had the same settings but we did not have this problem.
It is becoming increasingly obvious that you never actually performed
a switchover: it seems that you didn't promote the standby.
Either use
pg_ctl promote -D /path/to/datadir
on the command line or
SELECT pg_promote();
in SQL.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From what you sent:
"After switchover since 01.02.2024 hot standby server does not archive wal files. I couldn't find the problem."Hot standby normally does not archive WAL files. Only the primary server does that unless you have archive_mode set to "always" but your configuration shows that you have it "on" only."related postgresql.conf lines:archive_mode = on "Cheers,
Mateusz