On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 9:51 AM Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Looks like we have aarch64 and ppc64 machines running Alma 8 and 9. > No x86 though, which might matter for such a low-level failure > as this. So I guess that'll be on the list to add to the build farm at some point? (My Xanthian 'talent' of finding bugs continues, lucky me!) I get the impression AlmaLinux 9 isn't as widely used as Centos was yet. (I tend to follow my son's recommendation for which Linux distro to use, he's an SRE currently at YugaByte, which uses postgresql as a front end to their custom storage back end.) Mike Nolan
