Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Refresh Materialized View Issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 3:31 PM Jeremiah Bauer <jbauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello all,

We are having an issue with a materialized view refresh never finishing, any help is appreciated.  It will run at 100% CPU and no IO traffic indefinitely after about 15 minutes of parallel workers and the parent worker consuming CPU and IO.

PostgreSQL Version: 15.5

Due to some design decisions, we have a large table that we need a distinct list of associated id's out of for an application interface.  This table has approximately 1,650,000,000 rows with a table size of 175GB and 250GB of indexes. 

I anonymized the column names in the table structure, but this is the table structure of our large table.

create table public.large_table( 
   large_table_id bigint NOT NULL DEFAULT nextval(public.large_table_id_seq'::regclass),
    nmrc numeric(30,5),
    id1 bigint NOT NULL,
    id2 bigint NOT NULL,
    id3 bigint NOT NULL,
    id4 bigint NOT NULL,
    id5 bigint NOT NULL,
    last_updt_ts timestamp without time zone,
    last_db_updt_ts timestamp without time zone,
    charval character varying(30)

)

The materialized view is defined as:

create materialized view public.vw_distinct_list_of_ids as (

select distinct id1, id2, id3 from public.large_table

) with no data;

When refreshed the materialized view will contain approximately 59,000,000 rows.

It takes approximately 12 minutes to run the select statement from the view definition.  When you refresh the materialized view for the first time, it will spawn several parallel workers that run at 100% CPU and produce some I/O for about 12 or 13 minutes, then they finish their work and terminate.  The parent worker will continue to run at 100% CPU until I terminate the process.  I've let it run for over 24 hours.

What I find interesting is that if I do this:

create table public.table_of_distinct_list_of_ids as (

      select distinct id1, id2, id3 from public.large_table

);

It will complete in 12 or 13 minutes, the same as the select statement.  I have three questions.

My question is: what indexes are on public.large_table?  Hopefully there's a compound b-tree index on id1, id2, id3.
  1. Why is the materialized view refresh stalling and never completing?
  2. Is there a setting I am missing that affects materialized view refreshes?
  3. Should I just go with a table that is dropped and recreated instead?  I was hoping to avoid this.
A materialized view isn't too different from an unlogged table. 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux