On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 12:20 PM Francisco Olarte <folarte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ron:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 03:39, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
> Three of the 71 tables were not analyzed. Why would that be?
...
> vacuumdb -U postgres -h $DbServer --analyze -j6 -t ... -t cds.cdstransaction_rp20_y2021 -t ...
...
> cds.cdstransaction_rp20_y2021 | 2023-12-13 10:42:09.683143-05 | 2023-11-17 04:11:08.761861-05
> css.image_annotation_rp20_y2021 | 2023-09-25 20:00:07.831722-04 | 2023-09-25 20:00:07.831793-04
> tms.document_rp20_y2021 | 2023-12-13 10:42:03.079969-05 | 2023-11-17 04:11:56.583881-05
I'm not sure if you kept the line, but you have ellipsed-out ( is that
a word? )
I think so.
the interesting names, so quoted vacuumdb line is useless
for check.
71 tables were listed, and didn't want to flood my email with a KB or two of non-essential text.
I verified that all three tables were in the vacuumdb command line. (The list was generated by a query, and stdout and stderr were redirected to a file, and I grepped it for the table names.)
If you want, I can attach the log file.
