El día miércoles, octubre 25, 2023 a las 11:33:11 +0200, Andreas Kretschmer escribió: > Am 25.10.23 um 11:24 schrieb Matthias Apitz: > > We have a client who run REINDEX in certain tables of the database of > > our application (on Linux with PostgreSQL 13.x): > > > > REINDEX TABLE CONCURRENTLY d83last; > > REINDEX TABLE CONCURRENTLY d86plz; > > REINDEX TABLE CONCURRENTLY ig_memtable; > > REINDEX TABLE CONCURRENTLY ig_dictionary; > > REINDEX TABLE CONCURRENTLY ig_dictionary; > > REINDEX TABLE CONCURRENTLY d50zweig ; > > REINDEX TABLE CONCURRENTLY d50zweig ; > > > > We as the software vendor and support, do not use or recommend this > > procedure, because we have own SQL files for creating or deleting > > indices in the around 400 tables. > > > > The client is now concerned about the issue that the number of > > rows in some of the above tables has increased. Is this possible? > > In principle, there is nothing wrong with doing this in a maintenance > window, for example. But, this wasn't the question. It was: can it happen that the number of rows in thze table will increase by this operation? matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@xxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.unixarea.de/ +49-176-38902045 Public GnuPG key: http://www.unixarea.de/key.pub I am not at war with Russia. Я не воюю с Россией. Ich bin nicht im Krieg mit Russland.
