Search Postgresql Archives

Re: changing sort_mem on the fly?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 08:50:49PM +1100, Neil Conway wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> >I'd really like to see an improvement in how sort_mem/work_mem is
> >handled.
> 
> So would I :) (I think it's well known that the current system is not 
> optimal.)
> 
> Do you have any thoughts on how to improve it?

See http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2003-06/msg01072.php
and http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2003-06/msg01089.php

There could certainly be better ways than what I proposed, too. It might
be worth investigating how the 'big 3' handle it, though some of what
they do might be patented.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel@xxxxxxxxxxx 
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux