Ron <ronljohnsonjr@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Is there a way to define the SETOF record on the fly, like you do with > RETURNS TABLE (f1 type1, f2 type2)? Doesn't RETURNS TABLE meet the need already? regards, tom lane
Ron <ronljohnsonjr@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Is there a way to define the SETOF record on the fly, like you do with > RETURNS TABLE (f1 type1, f2 type2)? Doesn't RETURNS TABLE meet the need already? regards, tom lane
|