Hi everyone !
I have a good question on pg_dump/pg_restore and the search_path.
Consider that we have a function in the public schema witch is named my_function_in_public.
In PG11 this table :
CREATE TABLE public.test_dump (
id TEXT DEFAULT my_function_in_public()
);
id TEXT DEFAULT my_function_in_public()
);
When you dump this table with the pg11 binaries, you obtain this script :
CREATE TABLE public.test_dump (
id TEXT DEFAULT public.my_function_in_public()
);
id TEXT DEFAULT public.my_function_in_public()
);
=> the schema prefix have been added to the function by pg_dump.
In PG13, the same table :
CREATE TABLE public.test_dump (
id TEXT DEFAULT my_function_in_public()
);
id TEXT DEFAULT my_function_in_public()
);
When you dump this table with the pg13 binaries, you obtain this script :
CREATE TABLE public.test_dump (
id TEXT DEFAULT my_function_in_public()
);
id TEXT DEFAULT my_function_in_public()
);
=> the schema prefix have not been added.
Ok I understand that there is some modifications on how the dump is generated.
Now, if you try to restore the dump :
- PG11 to PG11 no problem
-
PG11 (exported with dump from PG11) to PG13 : no problem
-
PG11
(exported with dump from PG13) to PG13 : no problem
-
PG13 to PG13 : no problem
=> But PG13 to PG11 : problem : the function is not find because it is not prefixed. Seems legit.
What I don't understand is why PG13 to PG13 works ? If I look in this dump, we can see the search path is set to '' (empty) and the function isn't prefixed.
So how can it find where the function is ?
Does PG13 consider that when there is no prefix, we need to use "public" ?
Thank you for your lights on this.
Arthur Bazin