On 8/14/23 09:54, David Gilman wrote:
I have a query that was originally written as a handful of CTEs out of
convenience. It is producing a reasonable query plan because the CTE
materialization was kicking in at an appropriate place. The CTEs
aren't totally linear. The graph looks like this, where A, B, C and D
are CTEs, and B -> A means B selects from A. In Graphviz format:
G {
B -> A;
C -> A;
C -> B;
D -> C;
}
Out of curiosity I tried turning the query into a series of views and
ran that query. The query plan is vastly different, there is no
materialization and it runs much slower.
My question is: is this a valid bug? I am not sure if I should expect
the view version to find a way to materialize and produce a comparable
query plan. Also, making a minimal test case is going to take a bit
and I don't want to start unless this smells like a genuine bug.
What version of Postgresql?
(Also, back before, I think, v12, CTEs were optimizer fences. You were
better using views or sub-queries.)
--
Born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia.
