Search Postgresql Archives

Re:Re: How to improve the performance of my SQL query?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Thank you very much for taking the time to reply to my question. 


Sorry, I provided incorrect information.

The index also does not work in the following query statement.


> select COUNT(ET_CD)

> from TBL_SHA

> WHERE MS_CD = '009'

> AND ETRYS = '000001'


QUERY PLAN

Limit  (cost=2419643.47..2419643.48 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=128667.439..128668.250 rows=1 loops=1)

  ->  Finalize Aggregate  (cost=2419643.47..2419643.48 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=128667.437..128668.246 rows=1 loops=1)

        ->  Gather  (cost=2419643.25..2419643.46 rows=2 width=8) (actual time=128664.108..128668.233 rows=3 loops=1)

              Workers Planned: 2

              Workers Launched: 2

              ->  Partial Aggregate  (cost=2418643.25..2418643.26 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=128655.256..128655.258 rows=1 loops=3)

                    ->  Parallel Seq Scan on TBL_SHA  (cost=0.00..2415548.85 rows=1237762 width=9) (actual time=75357.455..128531.615 rows=1066667 loops=3)

                          Filter: ((MS_CD = '009'::bpchar) AND (ETRYS = '000001'::bpchar))

                          Rows Removed by Filter: 11833442

Planning Time: 0.118 ms

Execution Time: 128668.290 ms


The TBL_SHA table has another index, as shown below.


CREATE INDEX index_search_02 ON mdb.TBL_SHA USING btree (ET_CD, ETRYS)

CREATE INDEX index_search_03 ON mdb.TBL_SHA USING btree (MS_CD, ET_DAY, BK_CD, FR_CD, RM_CD)


When I take the following query statement, the result is returned quickly.

Why does index_search_01 always not work?


explain analyze

select TO_CHAR(MAX(TBL_SHA.ET_DAY),'YYYYMMDD') AS ET_DAY

from TBL_SHA

WHERE MS_CD = '008'

AND ET_CD = '000003'


QUERY PLAN

Limit  (cost=4.11..4.13 rows=1 width=32) (actual time=0.043..0.044 rows=1 loops=1)

  InitPlan 1 (returns $0)

    ->  Limit  (cost=0.56..4.11 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.032..0.033 rows=1 loops=1)

          ->  Index Scan Backward using index_search_01 on TBL_SHA  (cost=0.56..10836962.40 rows=3054052 width=8) (actual time=0.032..0.032 rows=1 loops=1)

                Index Cond: ((MS_CD = '008'::bpchar) AND (ent_day IS NOT NULL))

                Filter: (ET_CD = '000003'::bpchar)

  ->  Result  (cost=4.11..4.13 rows=1 width=32) (actual time=0.042..0.042 rows=1 loops=1)

Planning Time: 0.228 ms

Execution Time: 0.070 ms







At 2023-07-20 16:07:15, "Erik Wienhold" <ewie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 20/07/2023 09:09 CEST gzh <gzhcoder@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I'm running into some performance issues with my SQL query. >> The following SQL query is taking a long time to execute. >> >> explain analyze >> select COUNT(ET_CD) >> from TBL_SHA >> WHERE TBL_SHA.MS_CD = '009' >> and TBL_SHA.ETRYS in >> (select TBL_INF.RY_CD >> from TBL_INF >> WHERE TBL_INF.MS_CD = '009' >> AND TBL_INF.RY_CD = '000001' >> ) >> ----- Execution Plan ----- >> Limit (cost=2738709.57..2738709.58 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=124168.769..124168.771 rows=1 loops=1) >> -> Aggregate (cost=2738709.57..2738709.58 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=124168.767..124168.769 rows=1 loops=1) >> -> Nested Loop (cost=0.29..2730702.63 rows=3202774 width=9) (actual time=97264.166..123920.769 rows=3200000 loops=1) >> -> Index Only Scan using TBL_INF_pkc on TBL_INF (cost=0.29..8.31 rows=1 width=9) (actual time=0.025..0.030 rows=1 loops=1) >> Index Cond: ((MS_CD = '009'::bpchar) AND (RY_CD = '000001'::bpchar)) >> Heap Fetches: 1 >> -> Seq Scan on TBL_SHA (cost=0.00..2698666.58 rows=3202774 width=18) (actual time=97264.138..123554.792 rows=3200000 loops=1) >> Filter: ((MS_CD = '009'::bpchar) AND (ETRYS = '000001'::bpchar)) >> Rows Removed by Filter: 32000325 >> Planning Time: 0.162 ms >> Execution Time: 124168.838 ms >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> The index is defined as follows. >> >> CREATE INDEX index_search_01 ON mdb.TBL_SHA USING btree (MS_CD, ETRYS); >> >> >> When I take the following sql statement, the index works fine and the query >> is fast. >> >> select COUNT(ET_CD) >> from TBL_SHA >> WHERE MS_CD = '009' >> AND ETRYS = '000001' >> >> The amount of data in the table is as follows. >> TBL_SHA 38700325 >> TBL_INF 35546 >> >> Any suggestions for improving the performance of the query would be greatly >> appreciated. > >You can try EXISTS instead of IN to correlate the subquery and the outer query: > > SELECT count(et_cd) > FROM tbl_sha > WHERE tbl_sha.ms_cd = '009' > AND tbl_sha.etrys = '000001' > AND EXISTS ( > SELECT > FROM tbl_inf > WHERE tbl_inf.ms_cd = tbl_sha.ms_cd > AND tbl_inf.ry_cd = tbl_sha.etrys > ) > >-- >Erik

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux