On 7/11/23 12:35, Lorusso Domenico wrote:
yes, but this is a code inside each function.
having 20 functions I've to start executing this instruction 20 times,
one per function.
I know it could work, I looking for something of more smart :-)
Here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/66677cb3-17b3-20d1-1c22-9a7ac3208921%40aklaver.com
I provide options 1) and 3) to use instead of including the path change
in the functions(s).
Il giorno dom 9 lug 2023 alle ore 23:21 Adrian Klaver
<adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx>> ha scritto:
On 7/9/23 13:47, Lorusso Domenico wrote:
> Hello Adrian and Peter,
> yes the set parameter in function definition is also my preferred
> choice, but....
>
> I need to add the schema to path, not to substitute the path,
this is my
> problem
>
This post:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9f3db764-804e-7154-3f8c-f5f19628178e%40aklaver.com <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9f3db764-804e-7154-3f8c-f5f19628178e%40aklaver.com>
showed a way to do that.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Domenico L.
per stupire mezz'ora basta un libro di storia,
io cercai di imparare la Treccani a memoria... [F.d.A.]
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx