> On 01/07/2023 09:10 CEST Wen Yi <wen-yi@xxxxxx> wrote: > > I use the gdb to track the postgres like this: > > ... > pq_getbyte () at pqcomm.c:980 > 980 in pqcomm.c > (gdb) next > 985 in pqcomm.c > (gdb) next > 986 in pqcomm.c > (gdb) next > SocketBackend (inBuf=0x7ffc8f7e1310) at postgres.c:372 > > 372 postgres.c: Directory not empty. > (gdb) next > 403 in postgres.c > (gdb) next > 406 in postgres.c > (gdb) next > 407 in postgres.c > (gdb) next > ... > > But the question is: > It's too slow to input 'next' to run the postgres, I used to try to use the > 'continut', but the gdb will run the postgres directly and not print the > function name and code line > > I want to it print like this: > > ... -> pq_getbyte () at pqcomm.c:980 -> SocketBackend (inBuf=0x7ffc8f7e1310) at postgres.c:372 -> ... > > Can someone provide me some advice? > Thanks in advance! The Postgres wiki has a page on this topic: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Getting_a_stack_trace_of_a_running_PostgreSQL_backend_on_Linux/BSD Look for "backtrace" and gdb's bt command. -- Erik
