Jeff Ross <jross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 5/22/23 5:24 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote: >> So is the 1400G mostly in one database in the cluster? > Yes, one big database with about 80 schemas and several other smaller > databases so -j should help, right? AFAICT from a quick look at the code, you won't get any meaningful parallelism unless you have several large DBs and/or several large tablespaces. It looks like the assumption was that issuing link() requests in parallel wouldn't help much but just swamp your disk if they're all on the same filesystem. Maybe that could use rethinking, not sure. regards, tom lane
