Federico <cfederico87@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I think the tuple order would not be connected to the values, but be > determined by the input order of the rows in the insert. So when using > INSERT ... SELECT the tuple_order value would be determined by the > output of the select, using the same logic as ROW_NUMBER. We already rejected the idea that INSERT must preserve the order of the incoming tuples. Please don't re-propose it with different wording. regards, tom lane
