Greetings, * Imre Samu (pella.samu@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Theory: Maybe the search doesn't always work ... It does ... but perhaps not as expected (or as ideal). > Is this a known problem? Yes and no. > My use case: > in https://www.postgresql.org/list/ -> "Search the Archives" > search for the "large database backup" > -> > https://www.postgresql.org/search/?m=1&q=large+database+backup&l=&d=365&s=r > -> "Your search for large database backup returned no hits." Note that the default is "within the last year". That may not be ideal though and perhaps we should change it. > But at least one big thread exists: "big" is perhaps over-stating it, and most of it is actually about ZFS anyway, though a few of the initial emails on the thread are informative. > To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> > Subject: postgres *large database backup* > Date: 2022-11-30 15:40:23 > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BONtZ7CdiJ2X8x_8sPHR%2Btz-vv7mR1uoDzLia3fzWVZA9k0JQ%40mail.gmail.com > > *Changing the "Sort by" ..* Changing date to 'anytime', sorting by 'date' and using 'database backup' instead turns this thread up pretty quickly (number 7): https://www.postgresql.org/search/?m=1&q=database+backup&l=&d=-1&s=d That said, we should really be including the Subject line in the search and I don't think we are today (looks like we just search the body). The code is available for review here: https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgarchives.git;a=summary Patches to improve certainly welcome. Thanks, Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
