Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?
From: Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2023 11:07:59 -0400
Cc: pgsql-general list <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Comments: In-reply-to Steve Rogerson <steve.git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> message dated "Wed, 05 Apr 2023 16:02:28 +0100"
In-reply-to: <06e8753f-2254-438a-406c-a12a9354b540@woodsideendurance.co.uk>
References: <f8a40a55-0cfe-9c48-1f34-c157f34b5f46@woodsideendurance.co.uk> <2134938884.639895.1680690198796@office.mailbox.org> <06e8753f-2254-438a-406c-a12a9354b540@woodsideendurance.co.uk>

Steve Rogerson <steve.git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> That's the one. I can't see which pg version(s) this turned up in.

The pg_time_t change was in 8.0, the later one to support 64-bit tzdata
was in 8.4.

			regards, tom lane

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?
  - From: Steve Rogerson
- Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?
  - From: Erik Wienhold
- Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?
  - From: Steve Rogerson

Prev by Date: Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?
Next by Date: Proposal: Shared Work Mem Area
Previous by thread: Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?
Next by thread: Proposal: Shared Work Mem Area
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux