Thanks Laurenz.
I think the two are equivalent. If not, could you please explain why?
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 6:46 AM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2023-03-30 at 17:05 -0700, Siddharth Jain wrote:
> I have this question. Say I create a partitioned table on column X.
>
> Option 1:
>
> I add a primary key on (X,Y). Y is another column. Even though Y is a globally unique PK (global meaning it is unique across partitions, not just in one partition), Postgres does not allow me to
> create a PK on Y in a partitioned table.
>
> Option 2:
>
> I add PK on Y on each of the partitions
>
> Are these not equivalent? If not, which is better and why?
No, they are not equivalent.
Option 2 comes closer to guaranteeing uniqueness for column X, so use that.
> PS: This is what my best friend had to say:
>
> [...] If you are using the "table inheritance" approach [...]
Don't even consider that. Declarative partitioning is so much better.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
