"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 7:59 AM Martijn Tonies (Upscene Productions) < > m.tonies@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Can you modify the server code to store the original body in proc.prosrc >> again? It would be very helpful. > I seem to recall that this option had been discussed and rejected when this > feature went in. The parsed body is a feature because its contents can be > updated due to, e.g., renaming of objects. The text source of the original > command would be unable to be updated in the same way and so it is possible > the text and the parsed contents would diverge over time, which is a > situation we do not want to have. Indeed. We used to have a similar situation with respect to column default expressions and CHECK constraint expressions. Eventually we got rid of the textual storage of both, because it couldn't be maintained in a reasonable way. I think the answer here is "don't use the new syntax if you want the function body stored textually". You can have one set of benefits, or the other set, but not both at once. regards, tom lane
