On 15/11/2022 2:58 pm, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 11/15/22 10:54 AM, Frank Cazabon wrote:
On 15/11/2022 2:44 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
Frank Cazabon <frank.cazabon@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
If however I have a function defined like this
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.testfunction(
)
RETURNS TABLE
(
Firstname character(30)
)
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'
AS $BODY$
BEGIN
RETURN QUERY SELECT p.cFirstName FROM patients p;
END;
$BODY$;
And I call:
SELECT * FROM public.testFunction();
Then FirstName returns as a Memo field (similar to a Text field).
This is mostly about whatever software stack you're using on the
client side --- Memo is certainly not something Postgres knows about.
Any idea what I need to do to get it to return the character(30) type?
There's no chance of getting back the "30" part with this structure,
because function signatures do not carry length restrictions.
What I expect is happening is that you get firstname as an
unspecified-length "character" type, and something on the client
side is deciding to cope with that by calling it "Memo" instead.
You could perhaps work around that by defining a named composite
type:
create type testfunction_result as (firstname character(30), ...);
create function testfunction() returns setof testfunction_result as ...
regards, tom lane
Thanks, so I could define the function like this - removed the (30):
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.testfunction(
)
RETURNS TABLE
(
Firstname character
)
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'
No you don't want to do that:
select 'test'::char;
bpchar
--------
t
vs
select 'test'::varchar;
varchar
---------
test
Besides you missed the important part, after creating the type
testfunction_result:
create function testfunction() returns setof testfunction_result as ...
Sorry about the confusion, I have got it working using the type definition.
Thanks for the help
I'll try the type definition and see if that helps.
