On 10/25/22 09:58, David G. Johnston
wrote:
Yeah, sorry. Meant to distinguish to two "table" defs in some way.On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 8:56 AM Rob Sargent <robjsargent@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/25/22 09:24, David G. Johnston wrote:
OK. TBH I thought this was the JOOQ list! Didn't notice the typedef. So this is all about exact match "tables".On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 8:22 AM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 7:06 AM Rob Sargent <robjsargent@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2: select * from table join table b on Id = idb
#2 is probably conceptually correct but in this context should be written as:
Actually, a join is NOT conceptually correct here - the output columns for "SELECT *" will be wrong.
David J.
I suppose my #2 could be framed as
select a* from table as a join table as b on a.<criteria> = b.<criteria>
to be a functional equivalent of INTERSECT?
SELECT DISTINCT a.*
David J.
