Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Re[2]: CVE-2022-2625

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 11:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm a little bemused by your fixation on this particular CVE,
>> though.  As such things go, it's not a very big deal.

> A lot of times, requests like that come from a brainless kind of
> institutionalized security: we have to install all software updates
> that say "CVE".  Never mind that username = password and
> the application is running with a superuser.

Indeed :-(.  But we've issued several CVEs since 9.5 went out
of support --- notably, I'd say CVE-2022-1552 from the previous
minor-release cycle is a good deal more dangerous than this one.
So, again, why worry about -2625 in particular?

I'm still wondering whether the OP's installation is even on
9.5.latest; if not, they've likely got even more serious things
to worry about.  A quick troll through the 9.5.x release notes
finds a lot of bugs...

			regards, tom lane





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux