Hey David - thanks for the prompt response !
That is of course correct, but what I mean is that, I think that if one would explicitly query f(x), and never for x directly, it would've been
theoretically possible to say that the index is covering for every f(x), wouldn't it ?
Or in other words, if one only ever queries f(x), and the only available index is on f(x), then the index will hold all f(x) values
and would never need to reverse engineer the value of x to answer such a specific query.
Danny
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 3:28 PM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thursday, August 4, 2022, Danny Shemesh <dany74q@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:I believe the expressional index in itself could've been considered as covering, when querying for the _expression_ explicitly.This belief is wrong. When storing f(x) there is no way to recover the value of x.David J.
