On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 10:49 AM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 7/21/22 10:25, Christian Barthel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The sorting order of FK constraints with the same name is based on the
> OID (because it lands in the “Usually shouldn’t get here” OID comparison
> block at [1]). Wouldn’t it be better if the order of those constraints
> were based on the table name?
>
Why does it matter?
As the code comment says:
/* To have a stable sort order, break ties for some object types */
This seems like it is simply a missed case.
David J.
