|
Thomas, we already have a similar solution.
The idea is to use the native PostgreSQL SERIAL type.
Seb
From: Thomas Kellerer <shammat@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2022 8:56 AM To: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Concurrent INSERT statements with RETURNING clause resetting SERIAL sequence EXTERNAL: Do not click links or open attachments if you do not recognize the sender.
Sebastien Flaesch schrieb am 19.07.2022 um 18:50: > Tom, > > /If that's the behavior you want, you can build it out of standard SQL facilities (e.g. update a one-row table). > / > > Can you elaborate please? > > Do you mean the code should use an UPDATE on a one-row table to acquire a lock? I assume something like this: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://blog.sql-workbench.eu/post/gapless-sequence/__;!!I_DbfM1H!F7_2cNahve0cmwPMP6QBBwwpyP6UAum4ukFj71_21ebcxTKXZFtU0_3O6l1lfG5jYiKjO7wEzRt_E1GbJ9Q$ |
