"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 7:07 PM Bryn Llewellyn <bryn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> This is the bug. > While I haven't experimented with this for confirmation, what you are > proposing here (set + parallel safe) is an impossible runtime > combination (semantic rule) but perfectly valid to write syntactically. I'm not sure that that's actually disallowed. In any case, Bryn's right, the combination of a SET clause and a PARALLEL clause is implemented incorrectly in AlterFunction. Careless coding :-( regards, tom lane
