Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Per-Table vacuum_freeze_min_age

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Bisnett <cbisnett@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> The only downside I’ve seen is that this is a global setting and my
> understanding is that this would cause decreased performance when used with
> tables with a lot of writes and deletes. Is there a technical reason this
> setting cannot be applied at the database or table context like other
> autovacuum settings?

There's an autovacuum_freeze_min_age reloption, isn't that
what you need?

			regards, tom lane





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux