On 2022-Mar-27, Ralf Schuchardt wrote: > where did you read, that this DIN SPEC 91379 norm is incompatible with UTF-8? > > In the document „String.Latin+ 1.2: eine kommentierte und erweiterte > Fassung der DIN SPEC 91379. Inklusive einer umfangreichen Liste häufig > gestellter Fragen. Herausgegeben von der Fachgruppe String.Latin“ > linked here https://www.xoev.de/downloads-2316#StringLatin it is said, > that the spec is a strict subset of unicode (E.1.6), and it is also > mentioned in E.1.4, that in UTF-8 all unicode characters can be > encoded. Therefore UTF-8 can be used to encode all DIN SPEC 91379 > characters. So the remaining question is whether DIN SPEC 91379 requires an implementation to support character U+0000. If it does, then PostgreSQL is not conformant, because that character is the only one in Unicode that we don't support. If U+0000 is not required, then PostgreSQL is okay. -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
