Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Query on WAL Optimization and Streaming Replication

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok,
Then what will increase the size of the WAL?

Sent from my iPhone

> On 17-Mar-2022, at 8:08 PM, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-03-17 at 14:05 +0000, Shukla, Pranjal wrote:
>> From the configuration we have, does it mean that the primary will retain 32 WAL's
>> of 1 GB each and then start evicting the first WAL as soon as the last one gets filled?
>> In layman's term, 32GB is huge amount of data and I don't think that much changes
>> during upgrades. In fact the total size of our database is 56 GB. Is my understanding
>> correct?
>> 
>> wal_keep_segments = 32
> 
> No, it means that the last 32 WAL segments of size 16MB are retained,
> that is 0.5 GB.
> 
> "max_wal_size" is not the size of a WAL segment.
> 
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
> -- 
> Cybertec | https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com__;!!GjvTz_vk!CfWoaVi0_A_FauqITD6xevYV9YuIJGyWWueduHyTOiD3CY65CJorQpYhD5zbUA$




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux