Paul van der Linden <paul.doskabouter@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Thanks for the clarification, but giving up performance is a no-go for us. > Also I have my concerns about shemaqualifying each and every use of the -> > operator, there are really a lot of them in my functions and it would > severely impact readability. > Are these the only 2 solutions possible? As of v14 you could use SQL-style function definitions, so that the operator is parsed at function definition time instead of runtime. regards, tom lane
