On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:54:45 -0800, Joshua D. Drake <jd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > David Garamond wrote: > > > Tzahi Fadida wrote: > > > >> I recommend you don't use ext3 for any database: > >> http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Jan/0641.html > >> > >> apparently its still buggy. > > > > > > So what is the recommended fs under Linux? I don't need the best > > speed/throughput, but I prefer not to use ext2 due to long fsck time. > > I also tend to avoid reiser3, it has given us many griefs in the past. > > XFS? > > We have had success with XFS and JFS. XFS seems a little better supported. I'll 2nd (or 3rd?) that vote for XFS. Its been rock solid for my servers. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ L. Friedman netllama@xxxxxxxxx LlamaLand http://netllama.linux-sxs.org ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
