Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Index optimization ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 01:27:49PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bo Lorentsen <bl@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > select * from sale where id = currval( 'sale_id_seq' );
> 
> This is not legally optimizable into an indexscan, because currval() is
> a volatile function.  (It's easy to construct cases where its value
> actually does change from row to row --- just use a nextval() as well.)
> 
> You can fake it out in a couple of ways --- the recommended method is to
> wrap currval in a user-defined function that is misleadingly marked
> stable.  I think it still works to just put the call in a sub-select:
> 	select * from sale where id = (select currval( 'sale_id_seq' ));
> but I take no responsibility if future improvements in the planner break
> that trick.
 
Would it make sense to have a version of currval that will only return
one value in a statement/transaction? So the first time it's called it
remembers what currval for that sequence is and always returns the same
value?
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel@xxxxxxxxxxx 
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux