Richard Michael <rmichael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Would a tiny patch to the PREPARE docs be accepted? I'd like to help > clarify investigating `plan_cache_mode` for future readers. What did you have in mind? (I'm kind of allergic to documenting the plan-caching behavior in too much detail, because I keep expecting us to change it. On the other hand, nobody's put forward any improvement proposals.) regards, tom lane