On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 06:54, Avi Weinberg <AviW@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have a publisher with around 30 tables. I have two types of subscribers. Both types needs 25 "common" tables from the publisher plus 2-3 specific tables for each type of subscriber. > > For maintenance and monitoring reasons it is better for me to have both subscribers point to the same publisher but "skip/ignore" 2-3 tables that are not needed for them. If this is not possible, I will be forced to create 2 publishers. > > Any idea hot to ignore tables from publisher? That's not the way the APIs are defined. Creating 2 publications should not be a problem. Specifying the metadata for your situation would be about the same complexity in all cases. -- Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
